Owaisi

Hyderabad: All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen leader Owaisi responded to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s statement on Wednesday, saying that the people of Hyderabad are not cattle and that they are citizens, not the property of political parties. He said that Congress and BRS had given Hyderabad “on lease” to AIMIM. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Modi pointed a gun at the Congress and BRS, accusing them of having given Hyderabad to AIMIM on “lease” for all these years. “When Modi visited Telangana, he announced that Owaisi had been granted a lease on the Hyderabad seat. Hyderabad’s citizens are not livestock. Political parties do not own us; we are citizens. Hyderabad has trusted AIMIM for forty years after defeating the poisonous ideology of Hindutva. “May God grant us the victory over Hindutva once more,” Mr. Owaisi wrote on X.
He shifted the emphasis even more to election financing. “Modi is bonded to those who gave his party ₹ 6,000 crore through electoral bonds,” Mr. Owaisi remarked, criticizing Prime Minister Modi. He has sold or leased India’s assets to his backers in exchange.” “Modi placated them to such an extent that presently, 21 individuals own more wealth than the combined 70 crore Indians.” “His true parivar is those 21,” he continued. When Modi visited Telangana, he announced that Owaisi had been granted a lease on the Hyderabad seat. Hyderabad’s citizens are not livestock. Political parties do not own us; we are citizens. The AIMIM chairman had expressed frustration to ANI, stating that AIMIM has been beating the BJP for forty years.

Navneet Rana of the BJP on Asaduddin Owaisi brother’s “remove police” remarks: “Will take 15 seconds “

Maharashtra: Soldiers detained for allegedly requesting Rs 2.5 crore to “tamper with EVMs” from a Sena (UBT) leader. Phalodi Satta Bazar forecasts BJP gains in Uttar Pradesh for the Lok Sabha Election of 2024. UP 2024 Lok Sabha Election: Will there be 75 seats? Phalodi Satta Bazar is betting on the BJP’s significant wins under Modi in Uttar Pradesh. PM accuses Rahul of making a covert agreement with Ambani and Adani; Congress demands an investigation. Weather update: IMD says these states will continue to experience heatwaves; Yanam, Rayalaseema, and coastal Andhra Pradesh are expected to get heavy rainfall. Owaisi took it to X, saying, “Modi visited Telangana and announced that Owaisi had been leased the Hyderabad seat.”
Hyderabad’s citizens are not livestock. Political parties do not own us; we are citizens. Hyderabad has trusted AIMIM for forty years after defeating the poisonous ideology of Hindutva. “May God grant us the victory over Hindutva once more,” he wrote on X. When Modi visited Telangana, he announced that Owaisi had been granted a lease on the Hyderabad seat. Hyderabad’s citizens are not livestock. Political parties do not own us; we are citizens. “Modi is beholden to those who gave his party Rs 6,000 crore through electoral bonds,” Owasisi stated, turning the conversation away from the question of election funding. He has given his sponsors a lease on or sale of India’s assets in exchange.

Two BJP guys are detained in Gujarat for fraudulently casting ballots and live-streaming

“For forty years, we have been beating the BJP.PM Modi visited in 2014 and 2019, yet AIMIM prevailed here. What bank has the money for the electoral bonds, and where is the money for PM CARE funding, I would like to know, PM? Both inflation and unemployment are rising. To abolish reservations, Prime Minister Modi hopes to amend the constitution this year. He claims that we are infiltrators and that our daughters bear a large number of children, but this is untrue. Can a Muslim remove a Hindu woman’s “Mangalsutra”? “The Prime Minister is irritated,” he continued.
It would be the first time the BJP fielded a female candidate from the Hyderabad constituency when Madhavi Latha took on Asaduddin Owaisi , a four-time member of the Lok Sabha from the Hyderabad constituency. Since 2004, Asaduddin Owaisi has served as Hyderabad’s member of parliament, winning four elections. His father, Sultan Salahuddin Owaisi, served as Hyderabad’s parliamentary representative starting in 1984. Except for Goshamahal, almost every seat in the Hyderabad legislature is likewise held by AIMIM. Seven assembly segments comprise the Hyderabad Lok Sabha constituency: Bahadurpura, Chandrayangutta, Charminar, Goshamahal, Karwan, Malakpet, and Yakatpura. On May 13, the fourth phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections is set to take place, with voting for all 17 Telangana seats. TRS won nine seats, BJP four, Congress three, and AIMIM one in the general elections of 2019.

The Supreme Court of India strikes down Election Bonds

NEW DELHI: Calling it “unconstitutional,” the Indian Supreme Court on Thursday abolished a seven-year-old election funding scheme that permits people and businesses to give money to political parties anonymously and without restriction. The ruling is viewed as a blow to the Bharatiya Janata Party, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as they have benefited most from the system that was put in place in 2017. Opposition politicians and a civil society organization contested the Electoral Bonds system, arguing that it impeded the public’s right to know who had donated money to political parties. A person or business can use the system to purchase bonds from the government-owned State Bank of India (SBI.NS), open a new tab, and give the bonds to a political party.

According to the Association for Democratic Reforms, a non-governmental civil society organization that works on election funding in India, undeclared people and businesses purchased bonds worth 165.18 billion rupees ($1.99 billion) until November 2023. The group was a petitioner opposing the government. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud led a five-judge panel that declared: “Political contributions give the contributor a seat at the table… this access also translates into influence over policy making.”

The court stated that it is possible for financial contributions “to lead to quid pro quo arrangements” due to the close relationship between money and politics. Donations of cash in any amount are welcome. The bond system eliminated the revenue and profit-based restrictions that had been placed on businesses. The Supreme Court ruled that treating corporations and individuals equally for this was “manifestly arbitrary,” and it restored the corporate donation caps. The court stated that “contributions made by companies are purely business transactions made with the intent of securing benefits in return.” This means that a company has a far greater ability than an individual to influence the electoral process through political contributions.

An additional opacity layer

India’s election campaign financing system has been criticised for years for being an opaque means of supplying political parties with “black money.” However, Modi’s administration defended the measure, claiming it lessens the use of cash or “black money” in political financing and gives contributors a private way to donate to any party’s coffers. Until November 2023, undeclared individuals and corporations purchased bonds valued at 165.18 billion rupees ($1.99 billion), as per the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), an independent transparency watchdog focused on funding for Indian elections. According to ADR’s calculations, political parties utilized the program for more than half of all donations they received. It stated that the BJP received close to 57% of these donations between March 2022 and 2018. The Indian National Congress party, in contrast, garnered a mere 10 percent of the total. The ADR’s Jagdeep Chhokar, who had contested the plan in the highest court, predicted that the decision would put an end to political “mischief.”

The National Campaign for People’s Right to Information co-convener, Anjali Bhardwaj, told Al Jazeera that the ruling is important for democracy. She stated that it “recognises the fact that the stranglehold on policy and governance is achieved by big money through an opaque funding system of political parties” and that it “addresses squarely the issue of people’s right to know who is funding political parties.” “Big corporations were financing the parties and using a quid pro quo to negotiate terms that worked best for them. It was a setback for democracy.

How were electoral bonds issued and used?

A person or business could purchase these bonds from SBI under the current system in denominations ranging from 1,000 rupees ($12) to 10 million rupees ($120,000), and they could then donate the bonds to any political party they choose. After being initially offered for sale in early 2018, the bonds were delivered to the party that could exchange them for cash. Tax-exempt bonds were issued without the donor’s name on them. Election-related cash contributions are still permitted, but they are not tax deductible. Electoral bonds were first introduced and have since grown to be a major source of funding for politics. Opponents were concerned that the government might obtain data through the state-owned SBI, even though the donors were theoretically anonymous.

As the court reinstated corporate donation limits, it noted that given the close relationship between money and politics, it is possible that financial contributions “would lead to quid pro quo arrangements” and that treating individuals and companies equally for this was “manifestly arbitrary.” “Compared to an individual, a company has a far greater ability to influence the electoral process through political contributions. According to the ruling of the highest court, corporate contributions are only business dealings carried out with the hope of receiving rewards in return. The general election is scheduled for May, and transparency advocate Lokesh Batra described the court’s decision as historic. “The political parties would have made ten times more money in the days leading up to the election, even though they must have already made a significant amount of money before then. Thus, the sale has been terminated.

The Electoral Bonds Scheme’s Legality | Expounded

The government announced the scheme on January 2, 2018, introducing financial instruments that allow Indian individuals and companies to anonymously donate to political parties. Therefore, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), Congressman Dr. Jaya Thakur, and the non-governmental Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) opposed the plan, arguing that it violates voters’ right to information by opening the “floodgates” to anonymous political donations. In contrast, the Union government defended the plan by stating that political donations must remain anonymous to prevent fears of retaliation from other political parties. It was further contended that the program guarantees the proper banking channels through which “white” money is channeled for political funding.

Kailavi News

Tag Archives: modi

Owaisi Responds to the PM’s “Lease” Remark, Saying “People of Hyderabad Are Not Cattle”

Navneet Rana of the BJP on Asaduddin Owaisi brother’s “remove police” remarks: “Will take 15 seconds “

Two BJP guys are detained in Gujarat for fraudulently casting ballots and live-streaming

The Supreme Court of India strikes down Election Bonds, a blow to Modi’s BJP

The Supreme Court of India strikes down Election Bonds

An additional opacity layer

How were electoral bonds issued and used?

The Electoral Bonds Scheme’s Legality | Expounded

Navneet Rana of the BJP on Asaduddin Owaisi brother’s “remove police” remarks: “Will take 15 seconds “

Two BJP guys are detained in Gujarat for fraudulently casting ballots and live-streaming

Share this:

The Supreme Court of India strikes down Election Bonds

An additional opacity layer

How were electoral bonds issued and used?

The Electoral Bonds Scheme’s Legality | Expounded

Share this: