President order for SEAL team 6 to kill opponent
John Sauer, Trump’s attorney, had maintained that a president is immune from criminal prosecution for his acts while in office because, in the absence of such protection, political rivals might try to hold him accountable for divisive policy choices. According to John Sauer, a president cannot be accused of treason, accepting bribes, or killing a political rival unless he is impeached and found guilty in a Senate trial. Judge Pan questioned John Sauer about his assertion that the president “could order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival, could sell pardons, could sell military secrets.”
President would be founded guilty
- President would be swiftly impeached and found guilty of murder, John Sauer retorted. However, he countered that the Supreme Court has ruled that a president’s official actions are never subject to judicial review. According to our Constitution, a political process would need to take place, Sauer stated. “The official acts are immune if there is never an impeachment and no conviction. Exactly.” Attorney James Pearce, an assistant special counsel, expressed worry about the future of the nation if presidents could assassinate opponents or sell state secrets without facing any repercussions short of being impeached and found guilty. Trump claimed that the possibility of criminal charges against former presidents would limit their ability to act while in office, but the appeals panel rejected this claim.
The panel concluded, “We conclude that the public and Executive Branch’s interest in criminal accountability outweighs the potential risks of chilling Presidential action and permitting vexatious litigation.” “We conclude that there doesn’t seem to be much of a risk that former presidents will be unfairly harassed by federal criminal prosecutions.” Trump, who was present at the appeals hearing, was cleared in the Senate trial but impeached in the House of Representatives on the grounds that he encouraged the uprising on January 6, 2021.
“At bottom, former President Trump’s stance would collapse our system of separated powers by placing the President beyond the reach of all three Branches,” the ruling stated. “Presidential immunity against federal indictment would mean that, as to the President, the Congress could not legislate, the Executive could not prosecute and the Judiciary could not review.” The trial was originally set for March 4 by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, but it was postponed until all appeals were resolved. While he runs for president once more in November, Trump has attempted to postpone this and the three other criminal trials he is facing.
Which accusations is Trump attempting to refute?
In response to four federal charges—three for conspiracy and one for obstruction—Trump has entered a not guilty plea. The charges stem from his attempts to overturn the official election results and his false accusations of election fraud.
Prosecution claims
On January 6, 2021, the prosecution claims that the conspiracies culminated in the attack on the Capitol. Over 140 police officers were injured in the riot, which also forced lawmakers and then-Vice President Mike Pence to flee and momentarily prevented Congress from certifying Biden’s victory.