Tag Archives: Trump

News

Trump Backs Wicker in the Race for Re-Election 2024

March 2, 2024 Kailavi News 1 Comment

The front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024, former president Donald Trump, has once again supported the senior U.S. senator from Mississippi in his reelection campaign. On Thursday, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he supports Senator Roger Wicker. Trump wrote, “Senator Roger Wicker is an amazing Senator for the Great State of Mississippi.” “Roger is putting a lot of effort into strengthening our military, defending our nation, and supporting our veterans in his capacity as the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.” “Roger is a Champion of Conservative Values, who fights to Uphold the Constitution and Protect our Second Amendment,” continued President Trump. It was an honor to have Senator Roger Wicker’s endorsement last year, and I wholeheartedly support him for reelection. Take a look at Wicker and Trump on March 12th! Wicker, a senator from the United States Senate since 2007, was one of the leading Republicans in the state to support Trump’s third presidential bid in mid-December 2023, just before the primary season began.

Compared to the other contenders in the race, the incumbent senator has a name ID advantage throughout the entire state and a financial edge. According to campaign finance reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, Wicker has over $5 million in cash on hand, compared to $23,000 and $31,000 for Burton and Eubanks. Eubanks, who has represented State House District 25 since 2016, recently ran unopposed for reelection in 2023. Throughout his tenure in the Legislature, he has actively participated in the Freedom Caucus. After a stellar career in the US Marine Corps, Burton is a retired colonel, a decorated combat veteran, and a TOPGUN fighter pilot.

Trump has offered re-election

The action was taken the day before the Mississippi rally for Republican state senator Chris McDaniel, who is anticipated to declare his intention to challenge Wicker. Although McDaniel has long hinted at a potential Senate run, it’s unclear if he would challenge Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) in 2020 or take on Wicker right away. Cochran, who is 79 years old, may retire before his term expires due to health concerns. McDaniel teased an announcement on Monday night during a Facebook Live video, inviting followers to a rally on Wednesday. In the video, McDaniel stated, “You can probably read between the lines as to why I’ll be holding an event.” “We want to fight, and I can’t wait to have you back on my side.

” In that message, McDaniel discussed “the idea that we can run against strong established individuals,” igniting rumors that he would declare his intention to challenge Wicker. However, McDaniel’s potential outsider bid is complicated by Trump’s support for Wicker. Around the same time that former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon was preparing for primary runs against Republican incumbents, McDaniel’s name began to surface as a potential rival to Wicker. The notion had been that, even if the president didn’t expressly weigh in, the endorsement of Bannon would give rebel politicians more legitimacy and associate them with Trump. But Bannon’s power has diminished since he disparaged one of Trump’s sons. Against Cochran, McDaniel ran an incredibly impressive 2014 primary. Racism charges were made against Cochran supporters, and a supporter of McDaniel posted images of Cochran’s bedridden wife in a nursing home, turning that race ugly. After losing by a narrow margin in a runoff, McDaniel also refused to accept defeat and was accused of voter fraud.

Trump supports Wicker as the main opposition draws near election

Sen. Roger Wicker, a Republican from Mississippi, received a strong endorsement from President Donald Trump today, which helped the incumbent ahead of his anticipated high-profile primary challenge. The endorsement is a setback for Wicker’s prospective rival, conservative state senator Chris McDaniel, whose candidacy is largely dependent on gaining the support of the president’s core constituency. To get our massive tax cut bill completed and approved, @SenatorWicker of Mississippi has been a great supporter and incredible help,” Trump tweeted. Also very helpful in reducing regulations. I fully support him in getting re-elected!

Last year, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell personally urged Trump to back Wicker’s reelection campaign. Steve Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, was threatening to back a primary challenge from McDaniel at the time. Supporting vulnerable incumbents like Wicker has become a top priority for McConnell. It remains to be seen if Wicker can rise to the top with Trump’s backing. Trump supported Sen. Luther Strange, the incumbent, in the Alabama special election held last year, but Strange was soundly defeated by Roy Moore, the conservative favorite.

News

Trump uses the legacy of Navalny as a cover for his own legal troubles

February 21, 2024 Kailavi News 3 Comments

Trump uses the legacy of Navalny as a cover

After returning home to oppose Russian President Vladimir Putin’s harsh rule, Alexey Navalny died a political martyr. Nevertheless, Donald Trump continues to exploit his heroic past to draw erroneous comparisons between it and his own legal issues. Opponents of the former president have been criticizing him for days for not denouncing Putin following the death of Russian opposition leader Sergei Navalny in a Russian prison under circumstances that remain unclear. When given the opportunity to speak out against a Russian leader who has shattered democracy and a history of persecuting political opponents, Trump once again demonstrated his habitual unwillingness to do so during a Fox News town hall on Tuesday. He paid a moderating homage to Navalny and then went back to making his own unfounded accusations of political persecution.

This is a momentous moment for Trump

Trump compares the death of Navalny to a court order forcing him to pay millions in a civil fraud case. He described the Russian dissident as “a very brave guy,” but added that it was probably not a good idea for him to travel back to Russia before being imprisoned. The dissident’s body has still not been returned to his family. Then, Trump went back to his fixation on how he was being treated in his own nation, which, in contrast to Russia, has political freedoms, a right to a fair trial, and the ability for citizens to elect their own president. It also occurs in our nation. In many ways, we are becoming a Communist nation. And as you can see, I’m the front-runner and I was charged. I was four times indicted. As the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, Trump said during the Fox News event, “I have eight or nine trials… all because of the facts that I’m in politics.” About a $355 million civil fraud judgment that was rendered against him last week, he went on to say later that the ruling was “a form of fascism or communism, a form of Navalny.”

Trump is doing his best

There is no comparable universe between Trump and Navalny. For starters, Navalny returned to Russia despite nearly passing away from a nerve agent poisoning attempt that he attributed to Kremlin operatives. In his criminal cases, where he is entitled to a jury trial, Trump was charged by grand juries of his peers, despite his previous contention that the US Constitution should be repealed. Additionally, he has the right of appeal, which he has already exercised several times. There are none of these safeguards in the Russian legal system. Additionally, Trump is being prosecuted by the law, even though he claims to be a victim of persecution. This includes charges related to his attempt to rig the 2020 election and his hoarding of classified documents.

Actually, Trump and Putin appear to have more temperamental similarities than Navalny does, given his authoritarian tendencies. Trump’s idea of an unrestricted presidency and the total immunity from prosecution he is requesting from the Supreme Court appear to be more akin to the Russian model than the American one. Trump has characterized Putin, who is charged with war crimes for invading Ukraine, in a variety of ways, calling him “a genius” and “smart.” During his presidency, Putin seemed to prioritize achieving his objectives over long-term US interests. In 2016, he disregarded the advice of the intelligence agencies that were working for him and instead chose to believe the Russian president when he denied meddling in the election. Trump is the only US president in history to have attempted to stay in power after a democratic election by disobeying the wishes of the electorate, much like a Russian autocrat.

A tense situation with Russia becomes a significant election issue in 2024

The former president’s reluctance to discuss Navalny’s passing openly comes at a time when Washington’s strained ties with Moscow and a contentious discussion regarding US support for war-torn Ukraine are widening political rifts and are expected to play a significant role in and Trump’s general election contest. The president has made clear that he is disgusted by House Republicans under his predecessor’s leadership for refusing to approve his most recent $60 billion arms and ammunition package for Ukraine, which was recently approved by the Senate with support from both parties.

Biden has strongly denounced Trump‘s statement at a recent campaign rally suggesting that he would support Russia’s invasion of NATO allies who failed to reach their defense budget commitment targets. Following Navalny’s passing, the White House announced on Tuesday that it is preparing a fresh round of sanctions against Russia to add to the harsh list already in place due to the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine. Furthermore, Biden is already attempting to capitalize on Trump’s attempt to draw parallels between himself and Navalny as part of a fresh effort to bolster his campaign’s portrayal of his predecessor as unfit to hold the presidency again, as first reported by CNN’s MJ Lee. “The former President Trump and other Republicans refused to hold Putin accountable for his death after Putin’s most fierce opposition leader, Alexey Navalny, died in a Russian prison last week,” Biden stated in a new social media video that was posted on Tuesday, just in time for Trump’s town hall with Fox to air. Rather, Trump stated that the passing of Navalny opened his eyes to the awful state of America. He stated, and this is what I quote: “We are a failing nation in decline.” Trump frequently blames America; why? Navalny’s demise was caused by Putin. Why is Trump unable to simply say that?

Tensions with Russia are a very important issue

The president also made a new effort to draw attention to Trump’s animosity toward NATO partners, which has sparked worries that, should he retake the White House in November, he may attempt to leave the alliance and destroy the transatlantic security framework that resulted from the allies’ victory in World War II and helped win the Cold War against the former Soviet Union. “It is extremely risky what the former president stated. He declared that he would support Russia in doing—quote—”whatever the hell they want.” a declaration that was heard everywhere. It only serves to promote inappropriate behavior, according to Biden. In an attempt to put tremendous pressure on newly appointed House Speaker Mike Johnson, the White House has also started to attribute recent military setbacks in Ukraine—which coincide with ammunition shortages—to the Republican resistance to moving the arms package. It stated on Saturday that Russia had made its first significant gains in months as a result of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s forces being forced to evacuate the town of Avdiivka due to running out of supplies. Though it’s unclear if he will be able to keep his word given the political impasse in Washington, Biden has also promised Zelensky that US support will continue as the second anniversary of the Russian invasion draws near on Saturday. Longer term, too, it is obvious that not just American destiny but also the future of Ukraine will be up for election in November given Trump’s animosity toward Ukraine and his subservience to Putin.

News

Trump’s devastating loss in the fraud trial is a microcosm of a life characterized by defying authority

February 18, 2024 Kailavi News 1 Comment

Trump’s devastating loss in the fraud trial is a microcosm of a life characterised

A glimpse into Donald soul can be found in his business practices. Therefore, his heartbreaking defeat on Friday in a fraud case in New York, which puts his empire at jeopardy and his art of the deal mythology at risk, represents more than just a legal setback. With another divisive election approaching, it provides a character analysis of the actions, convictions, and worldview that characterize the DNA of an unstoppable force that is tearing apart American institutions, democracy, and the rule of law. Four fundamental codes were revealed during a trial that Trump tainted with histrionics and contempt for the legal system, as well as Judge Arthur Engoron’s final, stinging judgment.

These codes explain Donald turbulent life, which he views as an unending stream of business and political deals he must close. For Trump, the rules belong to someone else. He will always betray them in an attempt to get more money, prominence, or votes. When the former president’s fantasy doesn’t materialize, he creates a new one. Trump feels compelled to fight all the time, even when it would be wiser to back off. “The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience,” the judge said, summarizing the former president’s blatant refusal to live by the same rules that everyone else must follow and that, in this case, are essential to a functioning banking and economic system.

Red flags for President Trump

What should worry Trump the most is that Friday’s loss implies the safety net of impunity that has supported his wild political and commercial career is beginning to erode. Just three weeks have passed since a Manhattan jury in a defamation case granted writer E. Jean Carroll $83 million in compensatory damages for remarks he made in public in 2019 disparaging her and rejecting her claims of rape. The ex-president’s approach, which is to base his legal defenses on the political claim that the Biden administration is persecuting him, may have worked well during the campaign, but it is insufficient to withstand the rigorous standards of a court of law. When Trump was essentially giving a campaign speech from the witness stand during a pivotal moment in his fraud trial, Engoron questioned Trump’s attorney, “Can you control your client?” Naturally, no one has ever succeeded in doing so.

Despite two impeachments and a lost presidential campaign, Engoron’s decision demonstrates that the legal system can restrain Trump and impose consequences that the political system is unable to. Given that he is facing four criminal trials, this must be concerning for Trump, which may help to explain why he wants to regain control of the presidency to potentially overturn or prevent convictions—at least in federal cases. New York, the extravagant metropolis and state where Trump erected tall skyscrapers and developed an outrageous persona based on an all-publicity-is-good mentality to 1980s tabloids, is also dealing him a double blow. A different New York judge set March 25 as the beginning date of his first criminal trial on Thursday. The trial is about payments of hush money to a former adult film star. The next day, Engoron’s verdict rocked the real estate empire that had changed the skyline of Manhattan.

Broken laws, modern circumstances, and a failed legal plan

Trump’s political and business lives are shaped by his conviction that the rules belong to others. For example, it’s crucial to his current Supreme Court argument that presidents have complete immunity and are not subject to prosecution for their deeds after leaving office. When presented with the evidence, the former president refused to acknowledge the truth of his actions, leaving Engoron in awe of his boldness in defying business ethics and inflating the value of his real estate. “Defendants are unable to acknowledge their mistakes. Rather, they embrace a stance of “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” that is contradicted by the evidence, the author wrote. Engoron clarified that, in his opinion, Trump’s ill-gotten gains will continue in the absence of a painful price, which is why such a crushing verdict was required to account for them: “Donald Trump stated in his testimony that, in light of the information that has come to light during this trial, he still does not think the Trump Organization needs to make any changes.”

Attorney General Letitia James of New York filed a case against Trump, alleging that he repeatedly inflated the value of his holdings in order to get better terms from banks and financial firms and to ultimately make more money. This case also centers on Trump’s willingness to fabricate a convenient reality. The former president asserts that everyone profited from his actions and that no victims were affected. In contrast, average Americans’ financial lives and investments are far less lucrative, so they would never get away with such behavior. “Protect the integrity of the financial marketplace and, thus, the public as a whole,” Engoron further asserted, was his duty.

A crippling financial fine for Trump

Mr. Trump and his real estate company were fined $354,868,768 (£281 million), which was slightly less than what Ms. James had asked for. Even for a billionaire, this is a huge amount of money. The two sons of the former president who currently lead the Trump Organization, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, are required to pay $4 million in fines apiece. The former chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, Allen Weisselberg, has to pay $1 million. Millions more may be added to the total if the defendants are required to pay significant interest on their fines. According to Ms. James’ estimate, Mr. Trump’s debt may ultimately total $463.9 million.

“On every aspect, it is a resounding loss for the former president,” New York white-collar lawyer Mitchell Epner declared. Presumably, Mr. Trump will file an appeal of Judge Engoron’s ruling. However, he must pay the full fine within 30 days to have the verdict stayed while the appeal is pending. The fines follow closely behind the $83.3 million that a jury recently mandated he pay author E Jean Carroll for her defamation. When combined, the two may amount to more free money that Mr. Trump possesses. He could find the money in a few different ways, and each one could encounter difficulties. Before the decision, former federal prosecutor Sarah Kriss off stated, “He has to think about what to do with his assets, how to perhaps liquidate businesses to come up with that money.”

New York bars Trump from doing business, but the ban is temporary

For three years, Judge Engoron prohibited Donald Trump from conducting business in New York. Eric and Donald Jr., his sons, will be ineligible for two years. Justice Engoron decided against the lifetime ban that Ms. James had requested for Mr. Trump. The judge presiding over Trump’s fraud trial in New York is Arthur Engoron. Currently, Mr. Trump rarely stays in the city where he established his empire; the majority of his trips there have been for court appearances. Rather, he has made a strong name for himself in Florida, where the political environment is far more favorable. The verdict exposes Trump’s dubious business tactics

Citing a plethora of evidence from the trial, Justice Engoron supported his decision. And he did not mince words in explaining why he had rendered such a severe decision. He once cited Alexander Pope, a British poet, who said, “To err is human, to forgive is divine.” Judge Engoron noted that the defendants “apparently are of a different mind.” “Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological,” he stated. Defendants, however, are unable to acknowledge their mistakes. Rather, they take up a posture that is contradicted by the evidence: “See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.” “This trial has demonstrated the extreme carelessness with which the Trump Organisation conducts its financial operations as a business,” Will Thomas, a professor at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, said.

News

Supreme Court is asked by Special Counsel to allow Trump’s 2020 election case to go straight to trial

February 17, 2024 Kailavi News Leave a comment

Supreme Court is asked by Special Counsel to allow Trump’s 2020 election case

WASHINGTON (AP) — On Wednesday, special counsel Jack Smith implored the U.S. Supreme Court to expeditiously allow former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case to go to trial. In response to a request from the Trump team earlier in the week, prosecutors decided to keep the case on hold while the court decides whether to address the issue of whether the former president is exempt from prosecution for official acts while in the White House. Trump requested the intervention of the high court after an overwhelming decision by two lower courts to reject that position. A Few Attorneys for Trump May Be in Over Their Heads:” ‘Ludicrous’: Nikki Haley calls Bharara Trump’s plan to heavily tax Chinese goods. One of the four criminal cases against Trump, the case has reached a turning point, and the Supreme Court’s next move could influence whether Trump is tried in Washington this year or whether the proceedings will be delayed by more weeks or months of deliberations.

Importance of trail date of Supreme Court

Both sides place great importance on the trial date, which has already been delayed once due to Trump’s appeal for immunity. This year, prosecutors hope to prosecute Trump, and his defense attorneys have been requesting postponements in his criminal cases. In the event that Trump is elected while the case is still pending, he may try to get a pardon for himself or utilize his power as head of the executive branch to order the Justice Department to drop it. Both sides place great importance on the trial date, which has already been delayed once due to Trump’s appeal for immunity. This year, prosecutors hope to prosecute Trump, and his defense attorneys have been requesting postponements in his criminal cases. If Trump is elected while the case is still pending, he may try to get a pardon for himself or utilize his power as head of the executive branch to order the Justice Department to drop it. Prosecutors answered Trump’s appeal in two days, despite the court’s extension until next Tuesday, indicating their eagerness to move forward swiftly.

The case has “unique national importance,” according to the prosecutors, who also stated that “delay in the resolution of these charges threatens to frustrate the public interest in a speedy and fair verdict.” However, they did not specifically mention the November election or Trump’s position as the front-runner in the Republican primary in their filing. “The national interest in resolving those charges without further delay is compelling,” they stated. In August, Smith’s team accused Trump of attempting to rig the 2020 presidential election results, including by taking part in a plot to obstruct the electoral vote count in the lead-up to the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the building and engaged in a violent altercation with police.

“The alleged offenses are at the core of our democratic system. The last place to acknowledge a novel form of absolute immunity from federal criminal law should be the President’s alleged criminal scheme to rig an election and obstruct the orderly transition of power to his successor, they wrote. Since no other former president has been charged, Trump’s attorneys have claimed that he is exempt from prosecution for actions that he took while performing official presidential duties. This claim has never been put to the test in court. Last week, a three-judge appeals panel stated, “We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter.” Both the trial judge and a federal appeals court rejected those arguments.

One of the Supreme Court’s options is to deny the emergency appeal, allowing Chutkan to reopen the federal court trial in Washington. While it hears arguments on the immunity issue, the court may also decide to prolong the delay. If the justices do agree with lower court decisions that Trump is not immune from prosecution, the schedule they set may dictate when a trial starts. Invoking lower court rulings that denied the former president’s immunity, prosecutors urged the court to deny Trump’s petition to hear the case on Wednesday, stating that they “underscore how remote the possibility is that this Court will agree with his unprecedented legal position.”

However, Smith stated that if the court is determined to make a decision, the justices ought to hear arguments in March and render a decision by the end of June. Additionally, prosecutors refuted Trump’s claim that permitting the case to move forward would discourage future presidents from acting out of fear of being charged with a crime after leaving office and pave the way for politically driven lawsuits against former presidents. “That dystopian vision runs contrary to the checks and balances built into our institutions and the framework of the Constitution,” they stated. “Those guardrails ensure that the legal process for determining criminal liability will not be captive to ‘political forces,’ as applicant forecasts.”

News

What occurs now that Trump has taken his fight for immunity to the Supreme Court

February 13, 2024 Kailavi News 2 Comments

Trump has taken his fight for immunity to court

February 12, 2019 (Reuters) – Invoking a shield from prosecution for his attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss, Donald Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to postpone a ruling that rejected his claim. He claimed that without this protection, “the presidency as we know it will cease to exist.” In an
attempt to win back the presidency on November 5, Trump requested that the Supreme Court postpone the decision made on February 6 by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which had denied his request for immunity from prosecution.The legal team representing Donald Trump has not been coy about its plan to drag out the prosecution of his election subversion lawsuit as long as possible. The Supreme Court may indicate this week whether it is open to participating in this most recent ploy or not. In response to a recent appeals court decision that rejected his claim of presidential immunity for his actions before the January 6 riot, the former president formally asked the justices on Monday to put their decision on hold.

Get the prosecutors to respond

The court is expected to request a response from the team of special counsel Jack Smith regarding Trump’s request for a stay of the recent ruling against him on the immunity issue by the appeals court. There would probably be a very short deadline attached to a requested response. Even if the justices chose not to address Trump’s filing, this would still cause a delay in the case’s proceedings because the
trial cannot begin until the immunity claim is settled.

Choose to hear oral arguments before making a decision

The court might choose to handle Trump’s request like a typical appeal, which would entail setting a time for oral argument and issuing a thorough decision. Donald Trump during a Portsmouth, New Hampshire, campaign rally (Photo by Chip So ode villa via Getty Images). At a Portsmouth, New Hampshire, campaign rally, Donald Trump (Chip So ode villa / Getty Images file).Depending on how soon the court agreed to hear oral arguments and then make a decision, that could cause delays and increase uncertainty ahead of a trial date.

Accept Trump’s request

The court may choose to grant a delay in response to Trump’s request without holding oral arguments. In that case, the court would issue a brief written ruling approving Trump’s request. It would typically specify the conditions under which the pause would end. Usually, a ruling of this kind would be issued to allow
Trump time to file an appeal of the lower court decision, a process that could take several months to complete. If the court takes that course, there might be dissents.

Reject Trump’s request

The matter would return to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan for trial if the court ruled against Trump’s request for a pause. However, the trial would not start immediately. The judge would still have to give both parties time to prepare for trial and consider the entire period that the case has been essentially on hold since early December. In the event that the Supreme Court declines Trump’s request without delay and he is put on trial, he may later raise a challenge to his prosecution on the grounds of presidential immunity.

Rule against Trump right away

Given the unique nature of the case and the pressing need for a speedy resolution, some legal observers have conjectured that the court might take the unusual step of simply issuing a ruling affirming the appeals court decision without holding oral arguments or requesting any additional briefing. Such a decision would be predicated on the idea that, given the significance of the case to the entire country, the Supreme Court ought to address it, regardless of the justices’ opinion regarding the correctness of the appeals court’s decision.

Rule against Trump right away

News

Judges questioned the president’s order for SEAL Team 6 to kill a political opponent

February 8, 2024 Kailavi News Leave a comment

President order for SEAL team 6 to kill opponent

John Sauer, Trump’s attorney, had maintained that a president is immune from criminal prosecution for his acts while in office because, in the absence of such protection, political rivals might try to hold him accountable for divisive policy choices. According to John Sauer, a president cannot be accused of treason, accepting bribes, or killing a political rival unless he is impeached and found guilty in a Senate trial. Judge Pan questioned John Sauer about his assertion that the president “could order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival, could sell pardons, could sell military secrets.”

President would be founded guilty

President would be swiftly impeached and found guilty of murder, John Sauer retorted. However, he countered that the Supreme Court has ruled that a president’s official actions are never subject to judicial review. According to our Constitution, a political process would need to take place, Sauer stated. “The official acts are immune if there is never an impeachment and no conviction. Exactly.” Attorney James Pearce, an assistant special counsel, expressed worry about the future of the nation if presidents could assassinate opponents or sell state secrets without facing any repercussions short of being impeached and found guilty. Trump claimed that the possibility of criminal charges against former presidents would limit their ability to act while in office, but the appeals panel rejected this claim.

The panel concluded, “We conclude that the public and Executive Branch’s interest in criminal accountability outweighs the potential risks of chilling Presidential action and permitting vexatious litigation.” “We conclude that there doesn’t seem to be much of a risk that former presidents will be unfairly harassed by federal criminal prosecutions.” Trump, who was present at the appeals hearing, was cleared in the Senate trial but impeached in the House of Representatives on the grounds that he encouraged the uprising on January 6, 2021.

“At bottom, former President Trump’s stance would collapse our system of separated powers by placing the President beyond the reach of all three Branches,” the ruling stated. “Presidential immunity against federal indictment would mean that, as to the President, the Congress could not legislate, the Executive could not prosecute and the Judiciary could not review.” The trial was originally set for March 4 by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, but it was postponed until all appeals were resolved. While he runs for president once more in November, Trump has attempted to postpone this and the three other criminal trials he is facing.

Which accusations is Trump attempting to refute?

In response to four federal charges—three for conspiracy and one for obstruction—Trump has entered a not guilty plea. The charges stem from his attempts to overturn the official election results and his false accusations of election fraud.

Prosecution claims

On January 6, 2021, the prosecution claims that the conspiracies culminated in the attack on the Capitol. Over 140 police officers were injured in the riot, which also forced lawmakers and then-Vice President Mike Pence to flee and momentarily prevented Congress from certifying Biden’s victory.

Auto

In the election meddling case, the appeals court rejects Trump’s claims of immunity

February 8, 2024 Kailavi News 2 Comments

Election meddling case got rejected by court

Trump’s claims of immunity in the election meddling case are rejected by the appeals court. The court dismisses Trump’s argument that the case involves actions he took while in office and he cannot be criminally prosecuted. On Tuesday, a federal appeals court declined to support such an expansive interpretation of executive power, rejecting Donald Trump’s argument that he is immune from criminal prosecution on charges that he plotted to overturn the 2020 election results because the allegations concerned actions he took while in office. A three-judge panel at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit specifically disagreed with Trump’s assertion that he could only face prosecution if he had previously been found guilty in a Senate impeachment trial.

The unsigned but unanimous ruling from the three-judge panel stated, “We cannot accept former President Trump’s claim that a president has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralise the most fundamental check on executive power.” “In essence, the actions of the former president Trump would dismantle our division of powers by putting the President above the jurisdiction of all three branches,” the opinion stated. “We cannot accept that the President’s office elevates its former occupants above the law indefinitely.” In theory, the case and jurisdiction are returned to the trial court following Trump’s defeat. Nonetheless, the unfavorable decision opens the door for Trump to file additional appeals, which might cause a few weeks or months to pass before the US District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s trial in Washington, which is scheduled to begin on March 4. The special counsel Jack Smith filed a federal election interference case against Trump last year, alleging that he attempted to overturn his loss in the 2020 election by obstructing Congress on January 6 and advancing fictitious electors.

The trial judge denied the motion, which led Trump to file an appeal with the DC circuit. By requesting that the US Supreme Court decide the case directly, the special counsel attempted to avoid the possibly drawn-out appeals process; however, the court sent the case back to the appeals court. Trump’s loss was all but inevitable after his appellate attorney, John Sauer, continually appeared defensive during last week’s oral arguments before the panel of three judges, Michelle Childs, Karen Henderson, and Pan. Pan, who expressed disbelief at Trump’s interpretation, pointed out that, in theory, presidents could self-pardon, sell military secrets, or order the assassination of political rivals without ever facing criminal prosecution. Sauer had to deal with this during the hearing. The panel also questioned whether Trump’s 2024 stance differed from his 2021 position during his second impeachment trial, when his attorneys urged the Senate to find him not guilty, arguing that the Justice Department ought to determine whether Trump participated in insurrection over the Capitol attack on January 6.

News

Trump is bringing a well-known argument to the US Supreme Court: he is untouchable

February 7, 2024 Kailavi News Leave a comment

Reuters, WASHINGTON –

This week, Donald Trump will attempt to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a court ruling that barred him from Colorado’s ballot due to his actions regarding the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021. He will do this by arguing that, as a former president, the constitutional provision his opponents point to does not apply to him. Trump Assumes Liability for the Stock Market’s Record High Under Biden US NATO Ambassador: It’s “premature” for allies to be concerned about a possible Trump comeback. Experts in politics and religion claim that Evangelical Support for Trump Goes Beyond Abortion.

The Supreme Court is set to hear Trump’s appeal of a decision made by Colorado’s top court that disqualified him from the state’s Republican primary ballot under the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment for engaging in insurrection on Thursday. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority that includes three Trump appointees. In the U.S. election scheduled for November 5, he is the front-runner to face Democratic President Joe Biden for his party’s nomination. Even though Trump hasn’t claimed broad presidential immunity as a defense in that instance, the Supreme Court may still need to address the matter in criminal and civil cases involving his attempts to reverse his loss in the 2020 election and defamation lawsuits brought by a woman who has accused him of sexual assault.

Trump has previously demonstrated a disdain for limitations on his behavior. He made headlines in 2016 when he declared that he “could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters.” In an attempt to evade federal criminal charges related to his attempts to overturn his defeat to Biden in 2020, a Trump attorney told appellate judges that a president could direct Navy commandos to kill a political rival and remain unpunished unless impeached by the House of Representatives and found guilty by the Senate first. A spokesman for the Trump campaign, when asked to comment on his claims of immunity, referred to a social media post he made on January 10th, in which he claimed that a president could not function without “COMPLETE IMMUNITY.” Nine days later, Trump said in a post that presidents are entitled to immunity, even for “events that ‘cross the line.'” When the Supreme Court considers the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump is ineligible to be president due to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment—which prohibits any “officer of the United States” who “engaged in insurrection” from holding public office—it will face new issues. In that instance, Trump argues that since the president is not a “officer of the United States,” he is not covered by Section 3.

Trump is pursuing claims of immunity in other cases that may make it all the way to the Supreme Court, which has traditionally maintained that presidential immunity is not unqualified. The court determined that presidents have complete immunity from civil lawsuits for actions taken in their official capacity, but not from suits pertaining to personal and informal conduct, in cases involving former Presidents Bill Clinton in 1997 and Richard Nixon in 1982. It has never explicitly decided whether or not presidents are exempt from prosecution. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is currently considering Trump’s defence against federal criminal charges related to his attempts to overturn his election defeat, following the denial of his claim of immunity by a federal judge.

John Yoo, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley and former president of George W. Bush’s administration, stated he anticipates the Supreme Court will dismiss Trump’s argument. “His lawyers are pressing unprecedented arguments that are likely to fail in court, but they are not frivolous,” Yoo stated. In a similar vein, Trump has invoked presidential immunity to defend himself in civil lawsuits related to the Capitol riot, a criminal case in Georgia regarding election interference, and writer E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuit, which accuses him of defaming her by denying in 2019 that he sexually assaulted her in the 1990s. In 2020, the Supreme Court denied Trump’s request for protection against a subpoena issued by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.

Released in connection with an inquiry into hush money that Trump’s former attorney had given to a porn star prior to the 2016 election. Legal experts warned of the repercussions if Trump wins the immunity case at the Supreme Court, but they also expressed doubt about his chances of winning. According to Brianne Gorod, chief counsel of the liberal legal organization Constitutional Accountability Center, it would “send the dangerous message that presidents can disregard the Constitution and federal law with impunity.” “A win for Trump in the immunity case,” Gorod stated, “would be profoundly troubling regardless of who wins the election this November.”

News

The trial in Trump’s DC election meddling case has been postponed bya federal judge

February 3, 2024 Kailavi News Leave a comment

Trump

CNN, Washington — According to a recent court order in the case, the federal election subversion case

against former President Donald Trump has been postponed due to ongoing appeals regarding the
authority of the presidency. The trial date was set to take place in Washington, DC. The case has been
postponed while a federal appeals court considers arguments made by Trump regarding his immunity
from prosecution due to his role as president prior to the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
The trial was originally scheduled for March 4. The appeals court has not yet rendered a decision
regarding immunity. Even though it wasn’t official until US District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s order on
Friday, the likelihood that the March trial date would happen decreased. Chutkan cautioned Smith’s team
not to proceed without her approval after Trump’s team complained in January that prosecutors were still
submitting court documents despite the case’s suspension. The former president, who has pushed to
postpone the trial until after the 2024 presidential election, has won with the delay, though it remains to
be seen if he will be able to do so until after November’s election.
According to two Trump aides who spoke to CNN, Chutkan’s failure to set a new trial date is the main
reason why Chutkan’s team is pushing for additional delays in the most recent court order. The parties
and even court officials had also expected a delay, given the amount of time that has passed without a
DC Circuit decision regarding presidential immunity. It took the court nearly a month to rule on the case,
and it may take even longer. The DC Circuit’s decision is probably going to be challenged in an appeal to
the Supreme Court. Chutkan said in her order on Friday that the potential jurors would no longer be
required to complete a written questionnaire, even though they had been asked to appear in court the
following week. In the order, Chutkan stated,
“If and when the mandate is returned, the court will set a
new schedule.
” Special Counsel Jack Smith has charged Trump with four counts of election subversion,
including conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding and defraud the United States. The ex-president
entered a not guilty plea. Of the several criminal indictments that Trump is facing, the federal case
against him was scheduled to start first.
Given the conflicting trial date in Washington, the judge in the New York case—the first of four
indictments against Trump filed last year—has long rejected defense requests to move up the start date
to March 25. The judge made the correct assumption that the former president’s schedule might change
as the trial drew closer. Final details are expected to be worked out at Trump’s pretrial hearing in
Manhattan on February 15. It appears that the New York case will begin on schedule. Certain witnesses
have stated that they have been instructed to be prepared to testify, and the judge has been in
discussions with Trump’s attorneys and prosecutors regarding the jury selection process. In the New York

case, it is alleged that Trump concealed payments made on the Republican’s behalf to stifle negative
reports prior to his victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016, by classifying them as legal fees.
There’s no guarantee that Trump will serve time in prison, even though a guilty decision would give him
yet another historic distinction as the first former president to be found guilty of a crime and possibly
impede his bid to win back the White House. Rival campaign strategists and Trump detractors have long
lamented the fact that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was the first to be indicted, arguing that
this served to dilute the political impact of subsequent, more serious charges as voters became
disinterested or perplexed by the sheer number of cases.
Bragg has rejected the term “hush money” about his case, choosing instead to refer to it as another
instance of Trump “election interference” in recent weeks. However, this case concerns actions behind
closed doors during Trump’s initial 2016 presidential campaign. Meanwhile, Trump is being prosecuted in
Florida on numerous felonies for allegedly keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate without
authorization. The trial is scheduled for May 20, but it may still be postponed. In a different Georgia case,
he is accused of conspiring to rig the 2020 election in Fulton County by District Attorney Fani Willis. The
trial has not been scheduled.

News

A conservative critic of Trump talks about how the GOP is affected

February 2, 2024 Leave a comment

Senate Republicans insisted that changes in policy to address the situation at the southwest border be a condition of President Biden’s national security funding package for Ukraine. Republican divisions, however, could derail the bipartisan plan now that negotiators claim they are prepared to unveil its specifics. The plan aims to lessen the surge of migrants at the border. Politics is now threatening months of negotiations between Democrats, Republicans, and Biden administration officials. The Republican Party’s probable 2024 presidential nominee, former president Donald Trump, has been publicly criticizing the agreement and enjoining lawmakers to vote against it.

At the beginning of the week, negotiators pledged to release a bill soon. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., however, seemed to indicate on Wednesday that he’s prepared to move on and concentrate on providing funding to two important wartime allies of the United States. “It’s time for us to move something, hopefully including the border agreement, but we need to get help to Israel and Ukraine quickly,” McConnell stated to reporters. McConnell has continuously maintained that now, with divided government, is the time to pressure Democrats on border policy. When asked what the public would believe about Republican legislators who veto a bill because Trump ordered them to, McConnell evaded the topic. He continued, “I still favor trying to make law when you can,” and asserted that the bipartisan group’s proposed legislation is preferable to the existing immigration laws. He also stated, “You’re asking me a question I can’t answer right now, which is the fate of it.”

Senators are already aware of important details
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, the lead Democratic negotiator working on the border plan, has been hinting for days that the deal is essentially done and that the only thing holding it up is getting the GOP’s approval to proceed. “To help with the border crisis, we have a bipartisan agreement. For that, Republicans have been frantic. Why would they leave it like that?” Republicans in the Senate got together for their weekly lunch on Wednesday to talk about the next steps, but the general consensus that emerged from the meeting was that the lawmakers wanted to see the specifics. But following weeks of negotiations, lawmakers from both parties have already been briefed on the main points.
The bill includes several tools to address the border, such as granting the president the authority to close the border if the number of migrants trying to enter the country rises above a certain threshold, changing the criteria for granting asylum, and permitting migrants to work while their claim is being processed.
Extended talks gave detractors a platform
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., stated that the endeavor is “an uphill climb” since during the discussions, some members have formed opinions about the proposal’s potential effects, and “there are certain people who will never change their mind.” Tillis has stated that in order to proceed, a border plan must receive support from the majority of Senate Republicans. However, the fact that Trump intervened in the process has made many lawmakers reluctant to support the framework, making it more difficult to pass that test.
Sen. Jim Lankford, R-Oklahoma, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, Ariz., and Murphy are drafting the plan together. I. Lankford spent time on Sunday talk shows squashing rumors about the plan that the right-wing media is using to justify the admission of 5,000 more immigrants every day. Tillis described the meeting on Wednesday as “a good discussion.” However, he stated, “I would ask those same members, who are calling for time, to read it but not judge something they haven’t read.” The proposals are being dismissed by those who have already publicly opposed the bill. “This is a bad bill,” Texas Senator Ted Cruz stated to reporters. “And the simplest reason is, it doesn’t solve the problem.”Despite months of bipartisan negotiations, Cruz accused Senate Democrats of crafting a bill that “allows Joe Biden to continue the open borders.” Last week, Biden declared his support for the plan and threatened to shut down the border immediately if Congress approved it.

There is still some optimism
Murphy maintained his optimism on Wednesday, saying that the agreement would pass and be put to a vote on the floor perhaps this week. He suggested that others are making false claims about the necessity of seeing the entire text, while a “sizable, important group of Republican senators” is sincerely working to resolve the border issue.
“This is not an in-depth analysis of the problem. The question is whether they will prioritize putting Trump before finding a solution, Murphy stated.

Exit mobile version

Trump has offered re-election

Trump supports Wicker as the main opposition draws near election

Share this:

Trump uses the legacy of Navalny as a cover

This is a momentous moment for Trump

Trump is doing his best

A tense situation with Russia becomes a significant election issue in 2024

Tensions with Russia are a very important issue

Share this:

Trump’s devastating loss in the fraud trial is a microcosm of a life characterised

Red flags for President Trump

Broken laws, modern circumstances, and a failed legal plan

A crippling financial fine for Trump

New York bars Trump from doing business, but the ban is temporary

Share this:

Supreme Court is asked by Special Counsel to allow Trump’s 2020 election case

Importance of trail date of Supreme Court

Share this:

Trump has taken his fight for immunity to court

Get the prosecutors to respond

Choose to hear oral arguments before making a decision

Accept Trump’s request

Reject Trump’s request

Rule against Trump right away

Share this:

President order for SEAL team 6 to kill opponent

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: